Triple

T2338142
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Blue Mountains coffee E44358 entity
Predicate hasCaffeineContent P38318 FINISHED
Object similar to other Arabica coffees LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: similar to other Arabica coffees | Statement: [Blue Mountains coffee, hasCaffeineContent, similar to other Arabica coffees]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCaffeineContent
Context triple: [Blue Mountains coffee, hasCaffeineContent, similar to other Arabica coffees]
  • A. hasCafes
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or includes one or more cafes within it.
  • B. featuresBeverage
    Indicates that one entity includes, offers, or presents a particular beverage as part of its contents, services, or characteristics.
  • C. hasTeeType
    Indicates that an entity (typically a golf hole or course) is associated with a specific type or category of tee.
  • D. hasSugarContent
    Indicates that one entity possesses or contains a specified amount or level of sugar.
  • E. traditionalDrink
    Indicates that one entity is a beverage customarily consumed within the culture, heritage, or longstanding practices associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a889132b488190bbb43ad4780ddd92 completed March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc6f75d888190a2e41edaa532e83f completed March 7, 2026, 6:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc594087c819098100a10c5478a4b completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abc6f4245881909282b3184a288e2a completed March 7, 2026, 6:34 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:51 p.m.