Triple
T23378592
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885 |
E593674
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusOfSection11 |
P152504
|
FINISHED |
| Object | repealed |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: repealed | Statement: [Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885, legalStatusOfSection11, repealed]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfSection11 Context triple: [Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885, legalStatusOfSection11, repealed]
-
A.
legalCodeStatus
Indicates the legal or regulatory status assigned to a specific code within a legal or statutory system (e.g., active, repealed, pending).
-
B.
legalStatusAfter2011
Indicates the legal status or condition that applies to an entity starting from the year 2011 onward.
-
C.
significantLawSection
Indicates that a particular section of law is especially relevant or important in the context of the described legal situation or relationship.
-
D.
legalFrameworkStatus
Indicates the current legal or regulatory standing or condition of a given framework within a specified jurisdiction or context.
-
E.
legalStatusAffirmedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status has been formally confirmed or upheld within a specified legal jurisdiction, document, or proceeding.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d268a50819095f2fd479da8ef3f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a3b5e4f0819081a5d4586796677b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f061c7aaa48190a58ce93f87155ffc |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f0bd4a0e408190ad8916faf23562d9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:33 p.m.