Triple

T2337706
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oboe E44348 entity
Predicate countermeasuresFaced P38303 FINISHED
Object German jamming attempts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German jamming attempts | Statement: [Oboe, countermeasuresFaced, German jamming attempts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: countermeasuresFaced
Context triple: [Oboe, countermeasuresFaced, German jamming attempts]
  • A. controlMeasure
    Indicates a relationship where one entity implements or applies a method, action, or mechanism to regulate, mitigate, or manage a risk, process, or condition associated with another entity.
  • B. providesProtectionAgainst
    Indicates that one entity serves to guard, shield, or defend another entity from a specified harm, threat, or adverse effect.
  • C. defenseResult
    Indicates the outcome or consequence of a defensive action or strategy in response to an attack or threat.
  • D. safeguardingMeasuresInclude
    Indicates that certain specific protective or security measures are contained within, or form part of, a broader set of safeguarding measures.
  • E. defends
    Indicates that one entity protects or supports another entity against attack, criticism, or harm.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a889132b488190bbb43ad4780ddd92 completed March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc6f75d888190a2e41edaa532e83f completed March 7, 2026, 6:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc594087c819098100a10c5478a4b completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abc6f4245881909282b3184a288e2a completed March 7, 2026, 6:34 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:51 p.m.