Triple
T2336110
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona Supreme Court |
E44312
|
entity |
| Predicate | confirmationProcess |
P18494
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments
The Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments is a nonpartisan body that screens, evaluates, and recommends candidates for appellate judicial positions in Arizona.
|
E257001
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments | Statement: [Arizona Supreme Court, confirmationProcess, Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments Context triple: [Arizona Supreme Court, confirmationProcess, Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments]
-
A.
California Commission on Judicial Appointments
The California Commission on Judicial Appointments is a state body responsible for reviewing and confirming the Governor’s nominees to the California appellate courts, including the Supreme Court.
-
B.
Arizona judiciary
The Arizona judiciary is the branch of Arizona’s state government responsible for interpreting and applying the law through its system of state courts, including the Arizona Supreme Court and lower courts.
-
C.
Arizona Supreme Court
The Arizona Supreme Court is the state's highest judicial authority, responsible for interpreting the Arizona Constitution and overseeing the administration of justice within the state court system.
-
D.
Judicial Council of California
The Judicial Council of California is the policymaking body of the California courts, responsible for setting statewide rules, standards, and administration for the state’s judicial system.
-
E.
Judicial Council
The Judicial Council is the highest judicial body of the United Methodist Church, responsible for interpreting church law and ensuring its consistent application.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments Triple: [Arizona Supreme Court, confirmationProcess, Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments]
Generated description
The Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments is a nonpartisan body that screens, evaluates, and recommends candidates for appellate judicial positions in Arizona.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments Target entity description: The Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments is a nonpartisan body that screens, evaluates, and recommends candidates for appellate judicial positions in Arizona.
-
A.
California Commission on Judicial Appointments
The California Commission on Judicial Appointments is a state body responsible for reviewing and confirming the Governor’s nominees to the California appellate courts, including the Supreme Court.
-
B.
Arizona judiciary
The Arizona judiciary is the branch of Arizona’s state government responsible for interpreting and applying the law through its system of state courts, including the Arizona Supreme Court and lower courts.
-
C.
Arizona Supreme Court
The Arizona Supreme Court is the state's highest judicial authority, responsible for interpreting the Arizona Constitution and overseeing the administration of justice within the state court system.
-
D.
Judicial Council of California
The Judicial Council of California is the policymaking body of the California courts, responsible for setting statewide rules, standards, and administration for the state’s judicial system.
-
E.
Judicial Council
The Judicial Council is the highest judicial body of the United Methodist Church, responsible for interpreting church law and ensuring its consistent application.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confirmationProcess Context triple: [Arizona Supreme Court, confirmationProcess, Arizona Commission on Appellate Court Appointments]
-
A.
confirmationMethod
Indicates the means or process by which something is verified, validated, or confirmed as true or accepted.
-
B.
confirmedBy
Indicates that one entity validates, approves, or verifies the truth, accuracy, or occurrence of another entity or event.
-
C.
approvalProcess
Indicates the sequence of steps, decisions, and authorizations required for something to be formally reviewed and approved.
-
D.
confirmedFor
Indicates that an entity has been officially approved, scheduled, or validated to participate in, receive, or be associated with another specified entity or event.
-
E.
confirmationPower
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capacity to approve, validate, or formally confirm the actions, decisions, or status of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a889132b488190bbb43ad4780ddd92 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc6f75d888190a2e41edaa532e83f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:34 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ae897bf59c8190bc0ac8a4f3841832 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 8:49 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69ae8aceea58819098a98f7ad5818ac6 |
completed | March 9, 2026, 8:54 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69ae8b6c553481908b2b7b1f880b814d |
completed | March 9, 2026, 8:57 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc594087c819098100a10c5478a4b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:51 p.m.