Triple

T23357937
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Shmoney E593100 entity
Predicate gainedPopularityOn P57498 FINISHED
Object social media LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: social media | Statement: [Shmoney, gainedPopularityOn, social media]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: gainedPopularityOn
Context triple: [Shmoney, gainedPopularityOn, social media]
  • A. gainedProminenceAs
    Indicates that an entity became widely recognized or notable in the role, capacity, or identity specified by another entity.
  • B. gainedProminenceFor
    Indicates that an entity became widely recognized or notable specifically because of another entity, action, or achievement.
  • C. popularizedIn
    Indicates that something became widely known, accepted, or fashionable within a particular place, time period, or context.
  • D. hasEnduringPopularityOn chosen
    Indicates that something continues to be widely liked, used, or appreciated on a particular platform, medium, or context over an extended period of time.
  • E. popularizedAfter
    Indicates that one entity became widely known, accepted, or influential only after another specified entity had already gained popularity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d24d2a4819092e6ede74c2a918d completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f19a196b308190bfe9bb4b6e7ec363 completed April 29, 2026, 5:41 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effcfd8d288190937a887fe6023c11 completed April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:29 p.m.