Triple
T23352345
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Urim |
E592948
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDebatedNature |
P151988
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Urim, hasDebatedNature, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDebatedNature Context triple: [Urim, hasDebatedNature, true]
-
A.
hasDebateAround
Indicates that there is ongoing discussion, disagreement, or controversy surrounding the referenced entity or topic.
-
B.
hasLongTermDebateOn
Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
-
C.
hasDebatedScope
Indicates that there is an ongoing or unresolved discussion about the extent, boundaries, or applicability of the relationship or action in question.
-
D.
hasDebatedClaim
Indicates that an entity has engaged in a debate or argument concerning a particular claim.
-
E.
debatedAs
Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d24d2a4819092e6ede74c2a918d |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f19a14e04c81909c007b97cf5378b6 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcfd8d288190937a887fe6023c11 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f01d88b4ec8190a2a17a88e0eda178 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:20 p.m.