Triple
T23336395
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Capet |
E591596
|
entity |
| Predicate | endOfDirectLineRuler |
P151912
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Charles IV of France |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Charles IV of France | Statement: [Capet, endOfDirectLineRuler, Charles IV of France]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: endOfDirectLineRuler Context triple: [Capet, endOfDirectLineRuler, Charles IV of France]
-
A.
rulingLine
Indicates that one entity is the ruling or governing lineage, dynasty, or family over another entity (such as a territory, people, or polity).
-
B.
recognizedAsRuler
Indicates that one entity is acknowledged or accepted by others as the legitimate ruler or sovereign authority.
-
C.
involvesRuler
Indicates that the relationship or action includes or pertains to a ruler as a participating party.
-
D.
currentRuler
Indicates that one entity is the present reigning ruler or head of state of another entity (such as a country, region, or polity).
-
E.
providedRulerFor
Indicates that one entity supplied or designated another entity to serve as the ruler or governing authority over a particular domain or group.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d20156c81908c5c53195bd9c738 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f197f1e0588190bf073b92be0bf9e4 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcf8ca2c8190887d4f4656617d21 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f01d88b4ec8190a2a17a88e0eda178 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:16 p.m.