Triple
T23335431
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | south-central Nebraska |
E591566
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Aurora, Nebraska |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aurora, Nebraska | Statement: [south-central Nebraska, contains, Aurora, Nebraska]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Aurora, Nebraska Context triple: [south-central Nebraska, contains, Aurora, Nebraska]
-
A.
Aurora, Nebraska
chosen
Aurora, Nebraska is a small city in south-central Nebraska that serves as the economic and cultural hub of Hamilton County.
-
B.
O’Neill, Nebraska
O’Neill, Nebraska is a small city in north-central Nebraska known as the “Irish Capital of Nebraska” and serves as a regional agricultural and transportation hub.
-
C.
Fremont, Nebraska
Fremont, Nebraska is a small city in eastern Nebraska known for its agricultural roots, manufacturing industries, and proximity to the Omaha metropolitan area.
-
D.
La Vista, Nebraska
La Vista, Nebraska is a suburban city in Sarpy County that forms part of the greater Omaha metropolitan area.
-
E.
Douglas, Nebraska
Douglas, Nebraska is a small rural village located in Otoe County in the southeastern part of the state.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d20156c81908c5c53195bd9c738 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f197f08fe481908766e674164d6d45 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:16 p.m.