Triple
T23332955
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 |
E591494
|
entity |
| Predicate | justificationGivenAs |
P130462
|
FINISHED |
| Object | counter-terrorism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: counter-terrorism | Statement: [Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, justificationGivenAs, counter-terrorism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: justificationGivenAs Context triple: [Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, justificationGivenAs, counter-terrorism]
-
A.
justification
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
-
B.
justificationUsedBy
Indicates that a particular justification is employed or relied upon by a given entity (such as a person, system, or decision).
-
C.
claimedJustificationAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity presents another entity as the reason or rationale supporting its claim, action, or position.
-
D.
justified
Indicates that an action, belief, or decision is supported by sufficient reasons or evidence to be considered reasonable or warranted.
-
E.
officialJustification
Indicates the formally stated reason or rationale that an authority or institution gives to legitimize an action, decision, or policy.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d20156c81908c5c53195bd9c738 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f197eecc5c81908089eb43bc701196 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcf8ca2c8190887d4f4656617d21 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:15 p.m.