Triple

T23332922
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 E591494 entity
Predicate introducedAsEmergencyLegislation P151896 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, introducedAsEmergencyLegislation, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedAsEmergencyLegislation
Context triple: [Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014, introducedAsEmergencyLegislation, true]
  • A. enactedInResponseTo
    Indicates that one action, policy, or measure was carried out as a direct reaction to a specific prior event, condition, or stimulus.
  • B. enablingLegislationFor
    Indicates that one piece of legislation provides the legal authority, framework, or permission necessary for another law, program, or action to exist or operate.
  • C. legislativeActOf
    Indicates a relationship where a legislative act is authored, enacted, or formally issued by a specific legislative body or authority.
  • D. introducedAsBill
    Indicates that one entity is presented or referred to to others specifically under the name "Bill."
  • E. significantLegislation
    Indicates that a piece of legislation has substantial importance or impact within a legal, political, or social context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d20156c81908c5c53195bd9c738 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f197eecc5c81908089eb43bc701196 completed April 29, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effcf8ca2c8190887d4f4656617d21 completed April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f01d88b4ec8190a2a17a88e0eda178 completed April 28, 2026, 2:38 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:15 p.m.