Triple

T23331777
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Native American forces of Chief Tuskaloosa E591461 entity
Predicate opposedTechnology P151893 FINISHED
Object Spanish steel weapons and firearms LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spanish steel weapons and firearms | Statement: [Native American forces of Chief Tuskaloosa, opposedTechnology, Spanish steel weapons and firearms]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: opposedTechnology
Context triple: [Native American forces of Chief Tuskaloosa, opposedTechnology, Spanish steel weapons and firearms]
  • A. envisionedTechnology
    Indicates that an entity has imagined, conceptualized, or planned a particular technology, typically before it exists or is realized.
  • B. technologyAgnostic
    Indicates that something is designed or functions independently of any specific technology, platform, or vendor, and can work with multiple technological options.
  • C. technologyLevelComparedTo
    Indicates how the technological advancement of one entity compares relative to that of another entity.
  • D. laterUsedTechnology
    Indicates that one entity adopted or employed a technology after another entity had already used it.
  • E. associatedWithTechnology
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected to, involved with, or utilizes a particular technology.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d20156c81908c5c53195bd9c738 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f197edfbbc81908cb56507cd280737 completed April 29, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effcf8ca2c8190887d4f4656617d21 completed April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f01d88b4ec8190a2a17a88e0eda178 completed April 28, 2026, 2:38 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:15 p.m.