Triple

T23331137
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Londonbeat discography E591444 entity
Predicate isDiscographyOf P151886 FINISHED
Object Londonbeat NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Londonbeat | Statement: [Londonbeat discography, isDiscographyOf, Londonbeat]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isDiscographyOf
Context triple: [Londonbeat discography, isDiscographyOf, Londonbeat]
  • A. hasDiscographyType
    Indicates that an entity’s discography is classified as a specific type (such as studio albums, live albums, compilations, etc.).
  • B. hasDiscographyIn
    Indicates that an entity has released or contributed to musical recordings within a particular region, market, or catalog context.
  • C. hasDiscographyWith
    Indicates a relationship where two or more musical entities are associated through a shared or jointly produced discography.
  • D. hasDiscographyUnderName
    Indicates that an entity has released or published a body of recorded works (a discography) using a specified name or alias.
  • E. followsInDiscographyOf
    Indicates that one musical release comes after another in the ordered sequence of works within the same artist’s discography.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d20156c81908c5c53195bd9c738 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f197edfbbc81908cb56507cd280737 completed April 29, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effcf8ca2c8190887d4f4656617d21 completed April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f01d88b4ec8190a2a17a88e0eda178 completed April 28, 2026, 2:38 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:15 p.m.