Triple
T23315900
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reclaiming Development: An Alternative Economic Policy Manual |
E590704
|
entity |
| Predicate | positionOnNeoliberalism |
P151837
|
FINISHED |
| Object | critical |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: critical | Statement: [Reclaiming Development: An Alternative Economic Policy Manual, positionOnNeoliberalism, critical]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionOnNeoliberalism Context triple: [Reclaiming Development: An Alternative Economic Policy Manual, positionOnNeoliberalism, critical]
-
A.
positionOnSocialism
Indicates a stance, opinion, or level of support or opposition an entity holds toward socialism as a political or economic ideology.
-
B.
positionOnLaissezFaire
Indicates an entity’s stance or degree of support or opposition toward laissez-faire economic policies.
-
C.
positionOnFreedom
Indicates a stance or viewpoint an entity holds regarding the concept, extent, or conditions of freedom.
-
D.
positionOnRights
Indicates a stance, opinion, or policy an entity holds regarding rights (such as legal, human, or civil rights).
-
E.
positionOnNeutrality
Indicates the stance or viewpoint an entity holds regarding neutrality in a given context (e.g., political, ethical, or diplomatic).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1d32188190948eb76909d1dcc3 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f197816024819086c547ba89f84286 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcf8ca2c8190887d4f4656617d21 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f01d88b4ec8190a2a17a88e0eda178 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:06 p.m.