Triple
T23313260
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LFS |
E590636
|
entity |
| Predicate | crashRecoveryMethod |
P19129
|
FINISHED |
| Object | log replay |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: log replay | Statement: [LFS, crashRecoveryMethod, log replay]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: crashRecoveryMethod Context triple: [LFS, crashRecoveryMethod, log replay]
-
A.
recoveryMethod
chosen
Indicates the method or process by which something is restored, retrieved, or brought back to a previous or functional state.
-
B.
recoveryConfiguration
Indicates a configuration relationship specifying how an entity should be restored, recovered, or brought back to an operational state after failure or disruption.
-
C.
recoverySystem
Indicates a system or mechanism responsible for restoring a previous state, function, or data after a failure, loss, or disruption.
-
D.
recoveryArea
Indicates that one entity serves as the designated place or zone where another entity undergoes recovery or restoration after an event or process.
-
E.
recoveryCapability
Indicates the ability of an entity to return to a normal or functional state after experiencing damage, failure, or disruption.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1d32188190948eb76909d1dcc3 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1972ca70481909e2415c65964210a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcf8ca2c8190887d4f4656617d21 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:06 p.m.