Triple

T23313075
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RFC 5061 E590632 entity
Predicate extends P1244 FINISHED
Object RFC 2960 NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 2960 | Statement: [RFC 5061, extends, RFC 2960]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 2960
Context triple: [RFC 5061, extends, RFC 2960]
  • A. RFC 2960 chosen
    RFC 2960 is the original specification that defined the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), a transport-layer protocol designed for message-oriented, multi-stream communication.
  • B. RFC 4960
    RFC 4960 is the IETF standards document that specifies the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), a transport-layer protocol designed for message-oriented, multi-stream, and multi-homed communication.
  • C. RFC 2910
    RFC 2910 is an IETF specification that defines the Internet Printing Protocol/1.1 model and encoding for network printing.
  • D. RFC 5340
    RFC 5340 is the IETF specification that defines OSPF version 3, the link-state routing protocol for IPv6 networks.
  • E. RFC 2760
    RFC 2760 is an Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) document that provided guidelines and considerations for the deployment and operation of Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) on the Internet.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1d32188190948eb76909d1dcc3 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1972ca70481909e2415c65964210a completed April 29, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:06 p.m.