Triple
T2331094
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nanoarchaeota |
E44202
|
entity |
| Predicate | symbiosisType |
P13438
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ectosymbiosis |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ectosymbiosis | Statement: [Nanoarchaeota, symbiosisType, ectosymbiosis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: symbiosisType Context triple: [Nanoarchaeota, symbiosisType, ectosymbiosis]
-
A.
symbiontType
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of symbiotic relationship that exists between associated organisms.
-
B.
containsSymbioticAssociationsWith
Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses another entity with which it maintains a symbiotic (mutually dependent or beneficial) biological relationship.
-
C.
notableMutualism
Indicates a significant mutually beneficial relationship between two entities, where each provides important advantages or services to the other.
-
D.
cooperationType
Indicates the specific kind or form of cooperative relationship that exists between the related entities.
-
E.
speciesType
Indicates the specific biological species category to which an entity belongs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a889132b488190bbb43ad4780ddd92 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abcc30c5e881908c5d526d7e7491d0 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5926d048190a535e3f23d41de2a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:51 p.m.