Triple

T23306428
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Serigny Le Moyne E590449 entity
Predicate familyName P18 FINISHED
Object Le Moyne NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Le Moyne | Statement: [Serigny Le Moyne, familyName, Le Moyne]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Le Moyne
Context triple: [Serigny Le Moyne, familyName, Le Moyne]
  • A. Le Moyne chosen
    Le Moyne is a French surname notably borne by the colonial Le Moyne family, which produced several prominent explorers and administrators in New France and Louisiana.
  • B. Duchesne
    Duchesne refers to Antoine Nicolas Duchesne, an 18th-century French botanist and horticulturist known for his pioneering work on strawberries and other cultivated plants.
  • C. Montignez
    Montignez is a small former municipality in the canton of Jura in northwestern Switzerland, near the French border.
  • D. Bouchardon
    Bouchardon is a French surname most notably associated with Edmé Bouchardon, an 18th-century sculptor and draftsman of the late Baroque and early Neoclassical periods.
  • E. Grand Belfort
    Grand Belfort is an intercommunal administrative structure in northeastern France that groups together Belfort and surrounding communes to coordinate local governance and services.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1c0ecc8190a355aa229f06d0e0 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1972737c08190bd011776564c3861 completed April 29, 2026, 5:29 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:05 p.m.