Triple
T23301759
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Greenbelt Act, 2005 |
E590320
|
entity |
| Predicate | basedOnPolicyArea |
P7262
|
FINISHED |
| Object | land use planning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: land use planning | Statement: [Greenbelt Act, 2005, basedOnPolicyArea, land use planning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: basedOnPolicyArea Context triple: [Greenbelt Act, 2005, basedOnPolicyArea, land use planning]
-
A.
isPartOfPolicyArea
Indicates that one policy, topic, or issue belongs to, falls under, or is categorized within a broader policy area or domain.
-
B.
hasPolicyArea
chosen
Indicates that an entity (such as a policy, program, or initiative) is associated with or pertains to a specific policy area or domain.
-
C.
coversPolicyArea
Indicates that a policy, document, or initiative includes or addresses a particular policy area or topic within its scope.
-
D.
implementsPolicyArea
Indicates that an entity carries out, enforces, or operationalizes a specific policy area in practice.
-
E.
isResponsibleForPolicyArea
Indicates that an entity has primary authority or accountability for developing, overseeing, or managing a particular policy area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1c0ecc8190a355aa229f06d0e0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f196d37fd08190ad2d199c54324c02 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcf325f88190b320268c3c551abb |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:04 p.m.