Triple

T23300788
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd E590296 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object High Trees case NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: High Trees case | Statement: [Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd, alsoKnownAs, High Trees case]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: High Trees case
Context triple: [Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd, alsoKnownAs, High Trees case]
  • A. Mar Peerage Case
    The Mar Peerage Case was a landmark 19th-century legal dispute in the House of Lords over the rightful succession to the ancient Scottish earldom of Mar, with significant implications for peerage law and Scottish titles.
  • B. Auchterarder case
    The Auchterarder case was a pivotal 19th-century Scottish church legal dispute over congregational rights in ministerial appointments that helped trigger the Disruption of 1843 and the formation of the Free Church of Scotland.
  • C. Ashby v White
    Ashby v White is a landmark 1703 English tort law case establishing that the wrongful denial of a legal right, such as the right to vote, is actionable even without proof of specific damage.
  • D. Archer-Shee case
    The Archer-Shee case was a famous early 20th-century British legal scandal involving the wrongful accusation of a naval cadet, which became a landmark example of the fight for individual justice against institutional authority.
  • E. Keeble v Hickeringill
    Keeble v Hickeringill is an early 18th-century English common law case famous for establishing that malicious interference with another’s lawful use of their land, such as scaring away ducks from a decoy pond, can give rise to an action for damages.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: High Trees case
Target entity description: The High Trees case is a landmark 1947 English contract law decision by Lord Denning that established the modern doctrine of promissory estoppel.
  • A. Mar Peerage Case
    The Mar Peerage Case was a landmark 19th-century legal dispute in the House of Lords over the rightful succession to the ancient Scottish earldom of Mar, with significant implications for peerage law and Scottish titles.
  • B. Auchterarder case
    The Auchterarder case was a pivotal 19th-century Scottish church legal dispute over congregational rights in ministerial appointments that helped trigger the Disruption of 1843 and the formation of the Free Church of Scotland.
  • C. Ashby v White
    Ashby v White is a landmark 1703 English tort law case establishing that the wrongful denial of a legal right, such as the right to vote, is actionable even without proof of specific damage.
  • D. Archer-Shee case
    The Archer-Shee case was a famous early 20th-century British legal scandal involving the wrongful accusation of a naval cadet, which became a landmark example of the fight for individual justice against institutional authority.
  • E. Keeble v Hickeringill
    Keeble v Hickeringill is an early 18th-century English common law case famous for establishing that malicious interference with another’s lawful use of their land, such as scaring away ducks from a decoy pond, can give rise to an action for damages.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1c0ecc8190a355aa229f06d0e0 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f196d2b5dc819084b4d0290184de62 completed April 29, 2026, 5:27 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:04 p.m.