Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co | Statement: [Alfred Thompson Denning, notableCase, Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co]

Target entity: Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co
Context triple: [Alfred Thompson Denning, notableCase, Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co]

• A. Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co chosen
  Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co is a landmark English Court of Appeal case in which Lord Denning articulated the modern principle of liability for negligent misstatements in tort.
• B. Coggs v Bernard
  Coggs v Bernard is a landmark 1703 English contract and bailment law case, chiefly remembered for Lord Holt’s influential judgment clarifying the duties and liabilities of gratuitous bailees.
• C. Calder v. Bull
  Calder v. Bull is an 1798 U.S. Supreme Court decision that defined the limited scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause, holding that it applies only to criminal, not civil, laws.
• D. Johnson and Graham’s Lessee
  Johnson and Graham’s Lessee is the named party representing private land claimants in the landmark 1823 U.S. Supreme Court case Johnson v. M’Intosh, which established key principles of American property and Native land rights law.
• E. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
  Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.