Triple

T23300776
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Alfred Thompson Denning E590295 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object Miller v Jackson NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Miller v Jackson | Statement: [Alfred Thompson Denning, notableCase, Miller v Jackson]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Miller v Jackson
Context triple: [Alfred Thompson Denning, notableCase, Miller v Jackson]
  • A. Miller v Jackson chosen
    Miller v Jackson is a landmark English tort law case on private nuisance and the balance between individual property rights and the public interest in recreational activities, famously discussed in Lord Denning’s judgment.
  • B. Miller v. Johnson
    Miller v. Johnson is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the doctrine on racial gerrymandering and the Equal Protection Clause in legislative redistricting.
  • C. Marsh v. Chambers
    Marsh v. Chambers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of legislative prayer, finding that opening legislative sessions with a state-funded chaplain’s invocation did not violate the Establishment Clause.
  • D. Allen v. Milligan
    Allen v. Milligan is a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed and strengthened protections against racial vote dilution in redistricting under the Voting Rights Act.
  • E. Jackson v. Georgia
    Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1c0ecc8190a355aa229f06d0e0 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f196d2b5dc819084b4d0290184de62 completed April 29, 2026, 5:27 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:04 p.m.