Triple
T23299132
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | AGIL paradigm |
E590252
|
entity |
| Predicate | introducedInWorkOf |
P100163
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Talcott Parsons |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Talcott Parsons | Statement: [AGIL paradigm, introducedInWorkOf, Talcott Parsons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedInWorkOf Context triple: [AGIL paradigm, introducedInWorkOf, Talcott Parsons]
-
A.
firstAppearedInWorkBy
Indicates that an entity made its first appearance within a specific work created by a particular author or creator.
-
B.
attestedInWorksOf
Indicates that something (such as a claim, form, or usage) is documented or evidenced within the works produced by a particular author or creator.
-
C.
firstFormulatedInWork
chosen
Indicates the work (such as a publication or document) in which a concept, theory, or idea was first formally formulated or introduced.
-
D.
introducedInWorkType
Indicates that an entity was first introduced or appeared in a work of a specified type (e.g., book, film, game).
-
E.
discussedInWorkOf
Indicates that a subject is examined, treated, or talked about within a particular work or publication.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1c0ecc8190a355aa229f06d0e0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f196d133448190bf350a9f51c1531c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcf325f88190b320268c3c551abb |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:03 p.m.