Triple

T23298719
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Adagio on Hebrew melodies E590242 entity
Predicate hasExpressiveCharacter P151768 FINISHED
Object expressive LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: expressive | Statement: [Adagio on Hebrew melodies, hasExpressiveCharacter, expressive]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasExpressiveCharacter
Context triple: [Adagio on Hebrew melodies, hasExpressiveCharacter, expressive]
  • A. hasExpressivity
    Indicates that one entity possesses a certain level or type of expressive power, capability, or richness in representation relative to another.
  • B. hasExpressiveRole
    Indicates that an entity serves a communicative or expressive function or role in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. moreExpressiveThan
    Indicates that one entity conveys ideas, emotions, or information with greater richness, nuance, or clarity than another.
  • D. hasHumanCharacters
    Indicates that the subject includes or features characters that are human beings.
  • E. expressivePower
    Indicates the degree to which one system, language, or formalism can represent or capture the behaviors, structures, or concepts expressible in another.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d1c0ecc8190a355aa229f06d0e0 completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f196d133448190bf350a9f51c1531c completed April 29, 2026, 5:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effcf325f88190b320268c3c551abb completed April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f01d88b4ec8190a2a17a88e0eda178 completed April 28, 2026, 2:38 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:03 p.m.