Triple
T23295510
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Whoever's in New England |
E590157
|
entity |
| Predicate | bSide |
P15273
|
FINISHED |
| Object | I've Seen Better Days |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: I've Seen Better Days | Statement: [Whoever's in New England, bSide, I've Seen Better Days]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: I've Seen Better Days Context triple: [Whoever's in New England, bSide, I've Seen Better Days]
-
A.
I've Seen Better Days
chosen
"I've Seen Better Days" is a country song recorded by American singer Reba McEntire.
-
B.
For a Better Day
"For a Better Day" is a 2015 progressive house track by Swedish DJ and producer Avicii, known for its emotive melody and socially conscious music video addressing child trafficking.
-
C.
Better Days
"Better Days" is a reflective, piano-driven rock ballad by the Goo Goo Dolls that gained popularity for its hopeful message and frequent use in holiday and charitable contexts.
-
D.
Better Days
"Better Days" is a rock song by Bruce Springsteen from his 1992 album *Lucky Town*, reflecting themes of renewal and hope.
-
E.
Better Days
"Better Days" is a song featured on the country music album "Double Wide" by Uncle Kracker.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1af9d88190a0b9b5e8fa608618 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f196cec9e88190b83cfd53a6455e0f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:03 p.m.