Triple
T23295376
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rumor Has It |
E590154
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableSingle |
P3283
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fancy |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fancy | Statement: [Rumor Has It, notableSingle, Fancy]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fancy Context triple: [Rumor Has It, notableSingle, Fancy]
-
A.
Fancy
"Fancy" is a hip-hop track by American producer and rapper Swizz Beatz, known for its energetic production and club-oriented sound.
-
B.
Fancy
"Fancy" is a 2014 pop-rap hit by Australian rapper Iggy Azalea featuring Charli XCX, known for its catchy hook and chart-topping success.
-
C.
"Fancy"
chosen
"Fancy" is a popular country song, originally recorded by Bobbie Gentry and later famously covered by Reba McEntire, that tells the rags-to-riches story of a young woman overcoming poverty through controversial means.
-
D.
Fancy Day
Fancy Day is the charming young schoolmistress and love interest at the center of Thomas Hardy’s pastoral novel "Under the Greenwood Tree."
-
E.
Fabulous
"Fabulous" is an R&B song by American singer Jaheim, known for its smooth vocals and soulful, uplifting vibe.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d1af9d88190a0b9b5e8fa608618 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f196cec9e88190b83cfd53a6455e0f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:03 p.m.