Triple
T23281204
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rice's theorem |
E588867
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOf |
P4224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | undecidability theorem |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: undecidability theorem | Statement: [Rice's theorem, typeOf, undecidability theorem]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: undecidability theorem Context triple: [Rice's theorem, typeOf, undecidability theorem]
-
A.
Rice's theorem
chosen
Rice's theorem is a fundamental result in computability theory stating that any non-trivial semantic property of the language recognized by a Turing machine is undecidable.
-
B.
Tarski's undefinability theorem
Tarski's undefinability theorem is a fundamental result in mathematical logic showing that, in sufficiently strong formal systems, the notion of truth for the language of the system cannot be defined within that same language.
-
C.
Gödel's incompleteness theorems
Gödel's incompleteness theorems are two fundamental results in mathematical logic showing that any sufficiently powerful, consistent formal system cannot prove all true statements about arithmetic, and cannot prove its own consistency.
-
D.
Halting problem
The halting problem is a fundamental decision problem in computability theory that asks whether a given program will eventually stop running or continue to run forever, and is famously proven to be undecidable.
-
E.
Entscheidungsproblem
The Entscheidungsproblem is a foundational decision problem in mathematical logic that asks whether there exists a general algorithm to determine the truth or falsity of any given first-order logical statement.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d16e2c08190a291de254703129e |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f19642b46481909fd455acd2155792 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:57 p.m.