Triple

T23278851
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pamona E588798 entity
Predicate hasAncestralTo P151648 FINISHED
Object younger generations of Pamona people LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: younger generations of Pamona people | Statement: [Pamona, hasAncestralTo, younger generations of Pamona people]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAncestralTo
Context triple: [Pamona, hasAncestralTo, younger generations of Pamona people]
  • A. hasAncestor
    Indicates that one entity is an ancestor (direct or indirect, such as a parent, grandparent, etc.) of another entity in a genealogical or hierarchical lineage.
  • B. hasAncestralType
    Indicates that one type is derived from, or originates from, another more primitive or original type in an inheritance or lineage hierarchy.
  • C. destinedAncestorOf
    Indicates that one entity is fated or preordained to become an ancestor of another entity in the future.
  • D. hasAncestralRoots
    Indicates that one entity originates from, descends from, or is historically rooted in another entity or place.
  • E. hasAncestralEvent
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a past ancestral occurrence or event in its lineage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e25d16e2c08190a291de254703129e completed April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1957991108190ac82fa6dd355f722 completed April 29, 2026, 5:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effcecabd88190856fb6e1d993e4dd completed April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f01d8770d081908897c28b04e5faea completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:49 p.m.