Triple
T23272753
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GRT Records |
E588332
|
entity |
| Predicate | catalogStrategy |
P80342
|
FINISHED |
| Object | acquisition of existing labels |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: acquisition of existing labels | Statement: [GRT Records, catalogStrategy, acquisition of existing labels]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: catalogStrategy Context triple: [GRT Records, catalogStrategy, acquisition of existing labels]
-
A.
productStrategy
Indicates the strategic relationship in which an entity defines, plans, or guides the direction, positioning, and evolution of a product or product portfolio.
-
B.
catalog
Indicates the action of systematically listing, organizing, or recording items or information into a structured collection or database.
-
C.
platformStrategy
Indicates a relationship where an entity defines or employs an overarching plan for building, managing, or leveraging a platform to create and capture value among its participants.
-
D.
catalogName
Indicates that an entity has a specific catalog designation or title by which it is listed or identified.
-
E.
acquisitionStrategy
chosen
Indicates the method or approach by which one entity acquires or gains control, ownership, or access to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d148adc819088efbf42672604e9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1957518f88190bdd88ccc4e295668 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcecabd88190856fb6e1d993e4dd |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:47 p.m.