Triple
T23268134
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Timaru District Council |
E588210
|
entity |
| Predicate | governs |
P760
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pleasant Point |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pleasant Point | Statement: [Timaru District Council, governs, Pleasant Point]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pleasant Point Context triple: [Timaru District Council, governs, Pleasant Point]
-
A.
Pleasant Point
chosen
Pleasant Point is a small rural service town in New Zealand’s South Island, known for its heritage railway and agricultural surroundings.
-
B.
Parker Point
Parker Point is a popular scenic beach and snorkeling spot on Rottnest Island off the coast of Western Australia.
-
C.
Parker Point
Parker Point is a scenic coastal area and prominent shoreline feature in Blue Hill, Maine, known for its waterfront views and access to Blue Hill Bay.
-
D.
Garcon Point
Garcon Point is a small peninsula and unincorporated community in Santa Rosa County, Florida, located between Pensacola and East Bays.
-
E.
Hancock Point
Hancock Point is a small coastal village in Hancock, Maine, known for its scenic views across Frenchman Bay and its historic summer community.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d148adc819088efbf42672604e9 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f19570fcc0819091df22140828155b |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:42 p.m.