Triple
T23257924
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Special Court for Sierra Leone |
E581920
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChamber |
P2970
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Appeals Chamber |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Appeals Chamber | Statement: [Special Court for Sierra Leone, hasChamber, Appeals Chamber]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Appeals Chamber Context triple: [Special Court for Sierra Leone, hasChamber, Appeals Chamber]
-
A.
Appeals Chamber
The Appeals Chamber is the judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda responsible for reviewing and ruling on appeals against trial judgments and sentences.
-
B.
Appeals Chamber (Iraqi Special Tribunal)
The Appeals Chamber of the Iraqi Special Tribunal was the judicial body responsible for hearing and deciding appeals against verdicts and sentences issued by the Tribunal’s trial chambers, including in cases involving former regime officials.
-
C.
Appeals Chamber of the ICTY
The Appeals Chamber of the ICTY was the judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia responsible for hearing and deciding appeals from its trial judgments and sentences.
-
D.
Appeals Division (International Criminal Court)
The Appeals Division of the International Criminal Court is the judicial body responsible for reviewing and adjudicating challenges to decisions made by the Court’s lower trial chambers.
-
E.
ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II
ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II is a judicial body of the International Criminal Court responsible for early-stage proceedings such as authorizing investigations, issuing arrest warrants, and confirming charges in cases under its purview.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Appeals Chamber Target entity description: The Appeals Chamber is the judicial body within the Special Court for Sierra Leone responsible for reviewing and adjudicating appeals against trial judgments and sentences.
-
A.
Appeals Chamber
The Appeals Chamber is the judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda responsible for reviewing and ruling on appeals against trial judgments and sentences.
-
B.
Appeals Chamber (Iraqi Special Tribunal)
The Appeals Chamber of the Iraqi Special Tribunal was the judicial body responsible for hearing and deciding appeals against verdicts and sentences issued by the Tribunal’s trial chambers, including in cases involving former regime officials.
-
C.
Appeals Chamber of the ICTY
The Appeals Chamber of the ICTY was the judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia responsible for hearing and deciding appeals from its trial judgments and sentences.
-
D.
Appeals Division (International Criminal Court)
The Appeals Division of the International Criminal Court is the judicial body responsible for reviewing and adjudicating challenges to decisions made by the Court’s lower trial chambers.
-
E.
ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II
ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II is a judicial body of the International Criminal Court responsible for early-stage proceedings such as authorizing investigations, issuing arrest warrants, and confirming charges in cases under its purview.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e246079f58819085eaa9c260906880 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f194c5f5bc8190ac8776f7f7430209 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:19 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:11 p.m.