Triple

T23246726
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kyrie–Gloria–Credo–Sanctus–Agnus Dei E581601 entity
Predicate languageTraditionally P151529 FINISHED
Object Latin LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Latin | Statement: [Kyrie–Gloria–Credo–Sanctus–Agnus Dei, languageTraditionally, Latin]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageTraditionally
Context triple: [Kyrie–Gloria–Credo–Sanctus–Agnus Dei, languageTraditionally, Latin]
  • A. languageFamilyTraditional
    Indicates that one entity belongs to, or is classified under, the traditional language family of the other entity.
  • B. traditionalLanguageName
    Indicates the name traditionally used in a particular language to refer to the subject entity.
  • C. laterTraditionsLanguage
    Indicates that later traditions or sources refer to or describe the subject using the specified language.
  • D. languageTraditions
    Indicates that there is a relationship between entities involving the customs, practices, and conventions associated with the use, preservation, or transmission of a particular language.
  • E. languageOfSurroundingCulture
    Indicates that one entity is the language predominantly used or characteristic of the surrounding culture associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24606b17c81908aba1a4911c8a8ba completed April 17, 2026, 2:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f193f1e8448190b8420a8dc6e24576 completed April 29, 2026, 5:15 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effce4d704819092826931d430e8c4 completed April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f01d8770d081908897c28b04e5faea completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:10 p.m.