Triple
T23239654
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tunica Resorts, Mississippi |
E581400
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingBody |
P46
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tunica County government |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tunica County government | Statement: [Tunica Resorts, Mississippi, governingBody, Tunica County government]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tunica County government Context triple: [Tunica Resorts, Mississippi, governingBody, Tunica County government]
-
A.
Harrison County government
Harrison County government is the local administrative authority responsible for governing Harrison County, including managing public services, infrastructure, and county facilities.
-
B.
Hancock County government
Hancock County government is the local administrative authority responsible for providing public services, enforcing county regulations, and managing civic affairs in Hancock County, Tennessee.
-
C.
Hancock County government
Hancock County government is the local administrative authority responsible for providing public services, law enforcement, and governance for communities within Hancock County, Mississippi, including Pearlington.
-
D.
Wood County government
Wood County government is the local administrative authority responsible for providing public services, enforcing regulations, and managing county affairs in Wood County, Texas.
-
E.
Bay County government
Bay County government is the local administrative authority responsible for providing public services, enforcing regulations, and overseeing county operations in Bay County, Florida.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tunica County government Target entity description: Tunica County government is the local governing authority responsible for administering public services, regulations, and development within Tunica County, Mississippi.
-
A.
Harrison County government
Harrison County government is the local administrative authority responsible for governing Harrison County, including managing public services, infrastructure, and county facilities.
-
B.
Hancock County government
Hancock County government is the local administrative authority responsible for providing public services, enforcing county regulations, and managing civic affairs in Hancock County, Tennessee.
-
C.
Hancock County government
Hancock County government is the local administrative authority responsible for providing public services, law enforcement, and governance for communities within Hancock County, Mississippi, including Pearlington.
-
D.
Wood County government
Wood County government is the local administrative authority responsible for providing public services, enforcing regulations, and managing county affairs in Wood County, Texas.
-
E.
Bay County government
Bay County government is the local administrative authority responsible for providing public services, enforcing regulations, and overseeing county operations in Bay County, Florida.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2460556f88190be1744a84a84173f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f192ecc7e481908cac59df5c0deea1 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:11 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:10 p.m.