Triple

T23239440
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roman Jackiw E581395 entity
Predicate knownFor P22 FINISHED
Object Jackiw–Rebbi model NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jackiw–Rebbi model | Statement: [Roman Jackiw, knownFor, Jackiw–Rebbi model]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jackiw–Rebbi model
Context triple: [Roman Jackiw, knownFor, Jackiw–Rebbi model]
  • A. Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
    The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model is a theoretical framework in quantum field theory that illustrates spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and mass generation for fermions, analogous to mechanisms in superconductivity.
  • B. Georgi–Glashow model
    The Georgi–Glashow model is a grand unified theory in particle physics that unifies the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions within an SU(5) gauge symmetry framework.
  • C. Kobayashi–Maskawa theory
    The Kobayashi–Maskawa theory is a fundamental framework in particle physics that explains CP violation in the Standard Model through a three-generation quark mixing matrix (the CKM matrix).
  • D. Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
    The Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model is an effective quantum field theory that extends the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model by coupling quarks to the Polyakov loop to study chiral symmetry breaking and confinement in QCD-like systems.
  • E. Schwinger model
    The Schwinger model is a two-dimensional quantum electrodynamics theory that serves as a exactly solvable toy model for studying phenomena like confinement, chiral symmetry breaking, and anomalies in quantum field theory.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jackiw–Rebbi model
Target entity description: The Jackiw–Rebbi model is a theoretical framework in quantum field theory that demonstrates how topological solitons can give rise to fermion zero modes and fractional quantum numbers.
  • A. Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
    The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model is a theoretical framework in quantum field theory that illustrates spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and mass generation for fermions, analogous to mechanisms in superconductivity.
  • B. Georgi–Glashow model
    The Georgi–Glashow model is a grand unified theory in particle physics that unifies the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions within an SU(5) gauge symmetry framework.
  • C. Kobayashi–Maskawa theory
    The Kobayashi–Maskawa theory is a fundamental framework in particle physics that explains CP violation in the Standard Model through a three-generation quark mixing matrix (the CKM matrix).
  • D. Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
    The Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model is an effective quantum field theory that extends the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model by coupling quarks to the Polyakov loop to study chiral symmetry breaking and confinement in QCD-like systems.
  • E. Schwinger model
    The Schwinger model is a two-dimensional quantum electrodynamics theory that serves as a exactly solvable toy model for studying phenomena like confinement, chiral symmetry breaking, and anomalies in quantum field theory.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2460556f88190be1744a84a84173f completed April 17, 2026, 2:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f192ecc7e481908cac59df5c0deea1 completed April 29, 2026, 5:11 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:10 p.m.