Triple
T23234974
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lie algebroid |
E581260
|
entity |
| Predicate | isInfinitesimalVersionOf |
P151473
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lie groupoid |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lie groupoid | Statement: [Lie algebroid, isInfinitesimalVersionOf, Lie groupoid]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isInfinitesimalVersionOf Context triple: [Lie algebroid, isInfinitesimalVersionOf, Lie groupoid]
-
A.
isVersionOf
Indicates that one entity is a particular version, edition, or variant derived from another entity.
-
B.
isFiniteVersionOf
Indicates that one entity is a bounded, limited, or non-infinite instance or form of another entity.
-
C.
isYoungerVersionOf
Indicates that one entity represents the same individual as another entity, but at an earlier, younger stage in their life.
-
D.
isInternalVersionOf
Indicates that one entity is an internal or non-public variant, edition, or build of another entity.
-
E.
isAbstractVersionOf
Indicates that one entity represents a conceptual, generalized, or non-concrete version of another, more specific or concrete entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2460556f88190be1744a84a84173f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:39 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f192e8c7548190b53434eeb2620a6e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcdadec0819092ec1749ee453b4e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f01d8770d081908897c28b04e5faea |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:09 p.m.