Triple

T23231165
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lieutenant Thomas Glahn E581156 entity
Predicate hasRelationshipTypeWithEdvarda P151447 FINISHED
Object turbulent love affair LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: turbulent love affair | Statement: [Lieutenant Thomas Glahn, hasRelationshipTypeWithEdvarda, turbulent love affair]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelationshipTypeWithEdvarda
Context triple: [Lieutenant Thomas Glahn, hasRelationshipTypeWithEdvarda, turbulent love affair]
  • A. hasRelationshipTypeWith Valère
    Indicates that an entity stands in a specific, characterized type of relationship with Valère.
  • B. hasRelationshipTypeWith Alexandra Bergson
    Indicates that there exists a specific type or category of relationship between an entity and Alexandra Bergson.
  • C. hasRelationshipTypeWithNenaDaconte
    Indicates that there exists a specific type of relationship between an entity and Nena Daconte.
  • D. hasRelationshipTypeWithOmar
    Indicates that an entity stands in a specified type of interpersonal or associative relationship with Omar.
  • E. hasRelationshipTypeWithBalducci
    Indicates that there exists a specific, defined type of relationship between an entity and Balducci.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e246043c48819089bae72c9a9c306c completed April 17, 2026, 2:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f19231ef908190a791b4967916a66f completed April 29, 2026, 5:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69effcdadec0819092ec1749ee453b4e completed April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f01d8770d081908897c28b04e5faea completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:09 p.m.