Triple
T23210050
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Larry Wos |
E580566
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | pioneer in automated theorem proving |
C47400
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: pioneer in automated theorem proving Context triple: [Larry Wos, instanceOf, pioneer in automated theorem proving]
-
A.
automated theorem proving technique
An automated theorem proving technique is a systematic, algorithmic method used by computer programs to derive logical conclusions and verify the validity of mathematical or logical statements without human intervention.
-
B.
theorem prover
A theorem prover is a software system or algorithm that automatically or semi-automatically checks the validity of logical statements by deriving conclusions from axioms and inference rules.
-
C.
interactive theorem prover
An interactive theorem prover is a software system that assists users in the formalization and step-by-step verification of mathematical proofs or program properties through human-guided logical reasoning.
-
D.
pioneer in symbolic computation
A pioneer in symbolic computation is an individual or entity that significantly advances the theory, algorithms, or systems enabling computers to manipulate and reason about mathematical symbols and expressions exactly rather than numerically.
-
E.
higher-order logic theorem prover
A higher-order logic theorem prover is a software system that automatically or interactively checks, derives, and manipulates logical statements and proofs in a logic where functions and predicates can take other functions and predicates as arguments.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24602ae1481908aaa6bc7ca493867 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:07 p.m.