Triple
T23206301
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Praia de Guaratuba |
E580464
|
entity |
| Predicate | temNívelDeConservação |
P9592
|
FINISHED |
| Object | relativamente preservada |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relativamente preservada | Statement: [Praia de Guaratuba, temNívelDeConservação, relativamente preservada]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: temNívelDeConservação Context triple: [Praia de Guaratuba, temNívelDeConservação, relativamente preservada]
-
A.
typeOfConservation
Indicates the specific kind or category of conservation practice, method, or approach that applies to an entity or situation.
-
B.
conservationValue
Indicates the degree to which something is considered important or valuable for conservation or protection of natural or cultural resources.
-
C.
stateOfPreservation
chosen
Indicates the condition or degree to which something has been maintained, conserved, or kept intact over time.
-
D.
conservationStatus
Indicates the level of risk or protection category assigned to an entity, typically reflecting how threatened it is with extinction or decline.
-
E.
hasConservationAspect
Indicates that something is associated with, involves, or possesses a particular conservation-related aspect or consideration.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24602ae1481908aaa6bc7ca493867 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1907cd62c8190afee1e963b170727 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69effcccee508190a7ae311fdd319806 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:07 p.m.