Triple
T23199258
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Vișeu de Sus |
E579961
|
entity |
| Predicate | traversedBy |
P225
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Vișeu River |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vișeu River | Statement: [Vișeu de Sus, traversedBy, Vișeu River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Vișeu River Context triple: [Vișeu de Sus, traversedBy, Vișeu River]
-
A.
Vișeu River
chosen
The Vișeu River is a significant watercourse in northern Romania that flows through the Maramureș region and its traditional villages before joining the Tisa River near the Ukrainian border.
-
B.
Viștea River
The Viștea River is a mountain river in Romania that collects waters from the Viștea Valley and other nearby catchments before joining larger regional waterways.
-
C.
Vițău River
The Vițău River is a smaller watercourse in Romania that serves as a tributary within the Putna River basin.
-
D.
Voineșița River
The Voineșița River is a smaller watercourse in Romania that serves as a right-bank tributary of the Lotru River in the Southern Carpathians.
-
E.
Iecava River
The Iecava River is a watercourse in Latvia that serves as one of the tributaries feeding into the larger Lielupe River system.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24600eed08190bd7e5295653a1503 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1907835448190aa4fc234d15527c3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:06 p.m.