Triple
T23198073
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | War and Peace (murals) |
E579928
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brazil–United Nations relations |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brazil–United Nations relations | Statement: [War and Peace (murals), associatedWith, Brazil–United Nations relations]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Brazil–United Nations relations Context triple: [War and Peace (murals), associatedWith, Brazil–United Nations relations]
-
A.
Brazil–United States relations
Brazil–United States relations encompass the diplomatic, economic, and strategic interactions between Brazil and the United States, including cooperation on trade, security, and regional and global issues.
-
B.
Brazil–Belgium relations
Brazil–Belgium relations encompass the historical and contemporary diplomatic, economic, and cultural ties between Brazil and Belgium, including cooperation in trade, investment, and international affairs.
-
C.
Brazil–Portugal relations
Brazil–Portugal relations encompass the historical and contemporary diplomatic, cultural, and economic ties between Brazil and Portugal, shaped by their colonial past and shared language.
-
D.
Italy–Brazil relations
Italy–Brazil relations encompass the historical, political, economic, and cultural ties between Italy and Brazil, shaped by significant Italian immigration to Brazil and ongoing bilateral cooperation.
-
E.
Brazil
Brazil is the largest country in South America, known for its vast Amazon rainforest, diverse culture, and major cities like São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Brazil–United Nations relations Target entity description: Brazil–United Nations relations encompass Brazil’s longstanding diplomatic, peacekeeping, and multilateral engagement within the UN system, reflecting its role as a major regional power and advocate for global governance reform.
-
A.
Brazil–United States relations
Brazil–United States relations encompass the diplomatic, economic, and strategic interactions between Brazil and the United States, including cooperation on trade, security, and regional and global issues.
-
B.
Brazil–Belgium relations
Brazil–Belgium relations encompass the historical and contemporary diplomatic, economic, and cultural ties between Brazil and Belgium, including cooperation in trade, investment, and international affairs.
-
C.
Brazil–Portugal relations
Brazil–Portugal relations encompass the historical and contemporary diplomatic, cultural, and economic ties between Brazil and Portugal, shaped by their colonial past and shared language.
-
D.
Italy–Brazil relations
Italy–Brazil relations encompass the historical, political, economic, and cultural ties between Italy and Brazil, shaped by significant Italian immigration to Brazil and ongoing bilateral cooperation.
-
E.
Brazil
Brazil is the largest country in South America, known for its vast Amazon rainforest, diverse culture, and major cities like São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24600eed08190bd7e5295653a1503 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1907770b48190a3194ecce9b45f09 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 5 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:06 p.m.