Triple

T23185228
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff E579572 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Hawaii Housing Authority, et al. v. Midkiff, et al. — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hawaii Housing Authority, et al. v. Midkiff, et al. | Statement: [Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, fullName, Hawaii Housing Authority, et al. v. Midkiff, et al.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Hawaii Housing Authority, et al. v. Midkiff, et al.
Context triple: [Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff, fullName, Hawaii Housing Authority, et al. v. Midkiff, et al.]
  • A. Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff chosen
    Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly interpreted the Fifth Amendment’s Public Use Clause to allow government use of eminent domain for economic and social policy goals, such as breaking up concentrated land ownership.
  • B. Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs
    Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal Apology Resolution did not strip Hawaii of its authority to sell or transfer certain former crown lands, limiting the resolution’s legal effect.
  • C. Hawaii v. Mankichi
    Hawaii v. Mankichi is a 1903 U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the application of constitutional criminal procedure protections in newly annexed U.S. territories, particularly regarding jury trial and grand jury requirements in Hawaii.
  • D. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
    Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may prohibit all racial discrimination, private as well as public, in the sale or rental of property under 42 U.S.C. § 1982.
  • E. Federal Housing Administration v. Burr
    Federal Housing Administration v. Burr is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal sovereign immunity by holding that the FHA could be sued in certain circumstances under its "sue and be sued" clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245ff8000819090d12008805315b7 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18f7230208190820acf52f537b3ff completed April 29, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:05 p.m.