Triple

T23167719
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Walter Thirring E578756 entity
Predicate notableFor P22 FINISHED
Object Thirring model — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thirring model | Statement: [Walter Thirring, notableFor, Thirring model]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Thirring model
Context triple: [Walter Thirring, notableFor, Thirring model]
  • A. Schwinger model
    The Schwinger model is a two-dimensional quantum electrodynamics theory that serves as a exactly solvable toy model for studying phenomena like confinement, chiral symmetry breaking, and anomalies in quantum field theory.
  • B. Thirring
    Thirring is a surname most notably associated with Austrian physicist Hans Thirring, known for his contributions to general relativity and theoretical physics.
  • C. Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
    The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model is a theoretical framework in quantum field theory that illustrates spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and mass generation for fermions, analogous to mechanisms in superconductivity.
  • D. Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
    The Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model is an effective quantum field theory that extends the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model by coupling quarks to the Polyakov loop to study chiral symmetry breaking and confinement in QCD-like systems.
  • E. Lieb–Liniger model
    The Lieb–Liniger model is an exactly solvable quantum many-body system describing one-dimensional bosons with delta-function interactions, fundamental in the study of integrable systems and quantum gases.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Thirring model
Target entity description: The Thirring model is a fundamental exactly solvable quantum field theory in 1+1 dimensions describing self-interacting Dirac fermions, widely used as a testing ground for concepts in quantum field theory and many-body physics.
  • A. Schwinger model
    The Schwinger model is a two-dimensional quantum electrodynamics theory that serves as a exactly solvable toy model for studying phenomena like confinement, chiral symmetry breaking, and anomalies in quantum field theory.
  • B. Thirring
    Thirring is a surname most notably associated with Austrian physicist Hans Thirring, known for his contributions to general relativity and theoretical physics.
  • C. Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
    The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model is a theoretical framework in quantum field theory that illustrates spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and mass generation for fermions, analogous to mechanisms in superconductivity.
  • D. Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model
    The Polyakov–Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model is an effective quantum field theory that extends the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model by coupling quarks to the Polyakov loop to study chiral symmetry breaking and confinement in QCD-like systems.
  • E. Lieb–Liniger model
    The Lieb–Liniger model is an exactly solvable quantum many-body system describing one-dimensional bosons with delta-function interactions, fundamental in the study of integrable systems and quantum gases.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245fc75348190a0288401044c8af8 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18f2d51288190af0d5747090d8e5d completed April 29, 2026, 4:55 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:03 p.m.