Triple

T23156727
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject FDF E578458 entity
Predicate ICAOCodeForSameAirport P419 FINISHED
Object TFFF LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: TFFF | Statement: [FDF, ICAOCodeForSameAirport, TFFF]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ICAOCodeForSameAirport
Context triple: [FDF, ICAOCodeForSameAirport, TFFF]
  • A. ICAOcode chosen
    Indicates that an entity is identified by a specific four-letter airport or aerodrome code assigned by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
  • B. successorCodeForSameAirport
    Indicates that one code is the direct replacement or follow-up code for the same airport, reflecting a change while the underlying airport remains the same.
  • C. airportAlsoKnownAs
    Indicates that an airport is referred to by an alternative name or alias in addition to its primary name.
  • D. airportIATAAssociated
    Indicates that an airport is associated with a specific IATA (International Air Transport Association) code.
  • E. airportCodeContext
    Indicates that an airport code is being used or interpreted within a specific contextual framework (such as a region, system, or standard) that defines its meaning.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245fb8de081908f0eba7b5fd75bc4 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18efd598c81908fba9d583e30660e completed April 29, 2026, 4:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef89ff76808190808ee4ad9dea776b completed April 27, 2026, 4:08 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:01 p.m.