Triple
T23156451
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Osaka Derby |
E578450
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSupporterChants |
P39570
|
FINISHED |
| Object | club-specific songs and chants |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: club-specific songs and chants | Statement: [Osaka Derby, hasSupporterChants, club-specific songs and chants]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSupporterChants Context triple: [Osaka Derby, hasSupporterChants, club-specific songs and chants]
-
A.
hasFanChantPotential
Indicates that something (such as a song, phrase, or performance element) is well-suited to be adopted and enthusiastically chanted by a crowd or fanbase.
-
B.
hasChant
Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular chant.
-
C.
hasSupporter
Indicates that one entity supports, endorses, or backs another entity.
-
D.
associatedWithSupportersSong
chosen
Indicates that there is a relationship between an entity and a supporters’ song, such as being linked to, represented by, or commonly accompanied by that song.
-
E.
supportersCalled
Indicates that one party telephoned or attempted to telephone their supporters.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245fb8de081908f0eba7b5fd75bc4 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18efd598c81908fba9d583e30660e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef89ff76808190808ee4ad9dea776b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:01 p.m.