Triple

T23152729
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lëtzebuerger Fändel E578361 entity
Predicate alternativeFlagRelated P150620 FINISHED
Object Roude Léiw LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roude Léiw | Statement: [Lëtzebuerger Fändel, alternativeFlagRelated, Roude Léiw]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alternativeFlagRelated
Context triple: [Lëtzebuerger Fändel, alternativeFlagRelated, Roude Léiw]
  • A. alternativeFlag chosen
    Indicates that something is marked or designated as an alternative option or variant relative to a primary or default choice.
  • B. associatedWithFlag
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a particular flag, such as a national, organizational, or symbolic banner.
  • C. formerFlag
    Indicates that an entity previously served as a flag of another entity but no longer holds that status.
  • D. alternativeBenefit
    Indicates that one benefit serves as a substitute or replacement for another possible benefit in a given context.
  • E. alternativeHolder
    Indicates that one entity serves as an alternative or substitute holder in place of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245fb8de081908f0eba7b5fd75bc4 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18efaa1fc81908fb1987dbf732f46 completed April 29, 2026, 4:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ef89ff76808190808ee4ad9dea776b completed April 27, 2026, 4:08 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:01 p.m.