Triple
T23148647
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort |
E578260
|
entity |
| Predicate | regulatoryBody |
P86
|
FINISHED |
| Object | California Gambling Control Commission |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: California Gambling Control Commission | Statement: [Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort, regulatoryBody, California Gambling Control Commission]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: California Gambling Control Commission Context triple: [Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort, regulatoryBody, California Gambling Control Commission]
-
A.
Indiana Gaming Commission
The Indiana Gaming Commission is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing laws related to casino gambling and other licensed gaming activities in Indiana.
-
B.
Nevada Gaming Control Board
The Nevada Gaming Control Board is the primary state agency responsible for regulating and enforcing laws governing Nevada’s casino and gambling industry.
-
C.
California Lottery Commission
The California Lottery Commission is the state-appointed oversight body responsible for regulating, administering, and setting policy for the California State Lottery.
-
D.
Michigan Gaming Control Board
The Michigan Gaming Control Board is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing and licensing casino gaming and related gambling activities in Michigan.
-
E.
Washington State Gambling Commission
The Washington State Gambling Commission is the state agency responsible for regulating and overseeing gambling activities and ensuring compliance with gaming laws in Washington State.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: California Gambling Control Commission Target entity description: The California Gambling Control Commission is the state agency responsible for licensing and regulating gambling activities and ensuring the integrity of casino and cardroom operations in California.
-
A.
Indiana Gaming Commission
The Indiana Gaming Commission is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing laws related to casino gambling and other licensed gaming activities in Indiana.
-
B.
Nevada Gaming Control Board
The Nevada Gaming Control Board is the primary state agency responsible for regulating and enforcing laws governing Nevada’s casino and gambling industry.
-
C.
California Lottery Commission
The California Lottery Commission is the state-appointed oversight body responsible for regulating, administering, and setting policy for the California State Lottery.
-
D.
Michigan Gaming Control Board
The Michigan Gaming Control Board is the state regulatory agency responsible for overseeing and licensing casino gaming and related gambling activities in Michigan.
-
E.
Washington State Gambling Commission
The Washington State Gambling Commission is the state agency responsible for regulating and overseeing gambling activities and ensuring compliance with gaming laws in Washington State.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245fb8de081908f0eba7b5fd75bc4 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18ecf9e9881908991ede784158f1e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4:01 p.m.