Triple
T23143874
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | dipolar theism |
E577533
|
entity |
| Predicate | claimsCompatibilityWith |
P151087
|
FINISHED |
| Object | religious experience of a responsive God |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: religious experience of a responsive God | Statement: [dipolar theism, claimsCompatibilityWith, religious experience of a responsive God]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: claimsCompatibilityWith Context triple: [dipolar theism, claimsCompatibilityWith, religious experience of a responsive God]
-
A.
requiresCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity can only function correctly or be used if it is compatible with another specified entity.
-
B.
compatibleSign
Indicates that two entities are considered astrologically harmonious or well-matched based on their zodiac signs.
-
C.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
D.
compatibleStand
Indicates that one entity can be properly supported or held by another entity’s stand or mounting system.
-
E.
isGenerallyCompatibleWith
Indicates that two entities can typically function or coexist together without significant conflict, issues, or need for special adaptation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245f8e6248190ba3d58e068b4dccb |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18ecc3710819088ac5d72dad0459a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ef89f83b108190aaaa1db6221fc163 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 4:08 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ef9b7494f4819088ae59ea3d0ae8ab |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 4 p.m.