Triple
T2312409
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marburg Colloquy |
E51987
|
entity |
| Predicate | disputedDoctrine |
P37989
|
FINISHED |
| Object | nature of Christ's presence in the Lord's Supper |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: nature of Christ's presence in the Lord's Supper | Statement: [Marburg Colloquy, disputedDoctrine, nature of Christ's presence in the Lord's Supper]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disputedDoctrine Context triple: [Marburg Colloquy, disputedDoctrine, nature of Christ's presence in the Lord's Supper]
-
A.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
-
B.
doctrinalStatus
Indicates the formal standing or classification of a belief, teaching, or doctrine within a particular religious or ideological system.
-
C.
doctrinalStance
Indicates the specific set of doctrines, beliefs, or official teachings that an entity adheres to or promotes.
-
D.
doctrinalOutcome
Indicates the result or consequence that follows from applying or adopting a particular doctrine, teaching, or set of beliefs.
-
E.
contradictedTheory
Indicates that one entity has presented evidence, arguments, or findings that oppose, challenge, or invalidate the theory proposed by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88b0bb30c81908ded03b006d29387 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:42 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc685f05481909c863b29d1f6bacd |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc58e88e481908733fdf79d3f8a15 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abc682d094819081a96ffb77c4c42a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:32 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:49 p.m.