Triple
T23122927
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Seejiq |
E576948
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDialect |
P4251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Toda dialect |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Toda dialect | Statement: [Seejiq, hasDialect, Toda dialect]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Toda dialect Context triple: [Seejiq, hasDialect, Toda dialect]
-
A.
Toda language
chosen
The Toda language is a Dravidian language spoken by the indigenous Toda people of the Nilgiri Hills in southern India, known for its highly inflected grammar and endangered status.
-
B.
Raijua dialect
The Raijua dialect is a regional variety of the Sawu language spoken on Raijua Island in eastern Indonesia, distinguished by its own phonological and lexical features.
-
C.
Tomia dialect
The Tomia dialect is a regional variety of the Tukang Besi language spoken on Tomia Island in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia.
-
D.
Shodon dialect
The Shodon dialect is a regional variety of the Amami Ryukyuan language spoken on Shodon Island in Japan’s Ryukyu archipelago.
-
E.
Kamia dialect
The Kamia dialect is a regional variety of the Ipai-Tipai language traditionally spoken by the Kamia (Kumeyaay) people of southern California and northern Baja California.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245f6c2e881909a228fdcfeb7c7d3 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f18e517a0481909829a73fdf255d1c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:59 p.m.