Triple

T23119616
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Moore v. Texas E576853 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Moore v. Texas, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Moore v. Texas, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) | Statement: [Moore v. Texas, fullName, Moore v. Texas, 581 U.S. ___ (2017)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Moore v. Texas, 581 U.S. ___ (2017)
Context triple: [Moore v. Texas, fullName, Moore v. Texas, 581 U.S. ___ (2017)]
  • A. Moore v. Texas chosen
    Moore v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the standards for determining intellectual disability in capital cases, reinforcing constitutional limits on executing individuals with such disabilities.
  • B. Moore v. Harper
    Moore v. Harper is a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court rejected the broad "independent state legislature" theory and affirmed that state courts can review state legislatures’ rules for federal elections under state constitutions.
  • C. Moore v. Illinois
    Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
  • D. Sossamon v. Texas
    Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.
  • E. Texas v. White
    Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245f6c2e881909a228fdcfeb7c7d3 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18e4ece5481908d05b4b1e6a07db3 completed April 29, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:59 p.m.