Triple

T23119473
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Penry v. Lynaugh E576850 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Penry v. Lynaugh — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Penry v. Lynaugh | Statement: [Penry v. Lynaugh, fullName, Penry v. Lynaugh]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Penry v. Lynaugh
Context triple: [Penry v. Lynaugh, fullName, Penry v. Lynaugh]
  • A. Penry v. Lynaugh
    Penry v. Lynaugh is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment did not categorically prohibit executing individuals with intellectual disabilities, a stance later reversed in Atkins v. Virginia.
  • B. Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989) chosen
    Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment did not categorically bar the execution of individuals with intellectual disabilities, a stance later reversed by Atkins v. Virginia.
  • C. Perry v. Brown
    Perry v. Brown was a landmark federal appellate case challenging California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage, ultimately paving the way for the restoration of marriage equality in the state.
  • D. Lynce v. Mathis
    Lynce v. Mathis is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that held retroactive cancellation of early-release credits for prisoners violates the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause.
  • E. Betts v. Brady
    Betts v. Brady was a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held indigent defendants in state criminal cases were not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel, a rule later overturned by Gideon v. Wainwright.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245f6c2e881909a228fdcfeb7c7d3 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f18e4ece5481908d05b4b1e6a07db3 completed April 29, 2026, 4:51 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 3:59 p.m.